Jussie Smollett raps about his court case in ‘Thank You God’

Credit: Alamy

Supreme Court overturns Jussie Smollett conviction for alleged hoax

Fri 22 November 2024 10:44, UK

Hollywood actor Jussie Smollett was convicted of five counts of disorderly conduct in 2021, but on November 21st, 2024, the Illinois Supreme Court overturned that conviction.

Empire star Smollett – who is Black and homosexual – claimed he was the victim of a hate crime in 2019. He alleged that two men attacked him in the street near his apartment, shouting racial slurs before tying a noose around his neck.

However, the alleged perpetrators, a pair of brothers named Abel and Ola Osundairo who Smollett met through Empire, testified that he paid them £3,500 to stage the incident. Smollett was sentenced to 150 days in prison, but an appeal from his legal team led to him serving only six of those days.

The attorneys successfully argued that a special prosecutor should not have charged Smollett because the Cook County State Attorney’s Office agreed to a programme of community service in exchange for dropping the charges.

At the time, the decision was highly controversial, with Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel stating the star was “let off scot-free, with no sense of accountability for the moral and ethical wrong of his actions.”

Two years after his charges were dropped, though, Smollett was prosecuted a second time by special prosecutor Dan Webb. This resulted in his disorderly conduct conviction, but once again, Smollett’s attorneys successfully argued to overturn the decision.

Smollett’s legal team argued that his Fifth Amendment rights, which protect against double jeopardy, were violated when he was prosecuted a second time. The Illinois Supreme Court agreed with Smollett’s defence team, overturning his conviction and dismissing the entire case against him.

In the official court ruling, Justice Elizabeth Rochford said, “Today we resolve a question about the State’s responsibility to honour the agreements it makes with defendants. Specifically, we address whether a dismissal of a case by ‘nolle prosequi’ allows the State to bring a second prosecution when the dismissal was entered as part of an agreement with the defendant and the defendant has performed his part of the bargain. We hold that a second prosecution under these circumstances is a due process violation, and we therefore reverse defendant’s conviction.”

Smollett’s reaction to the dismissal

Smollet, who has maintained his innocence from the start, was said to be relieved with the decision, and feels he is finally free to move on with his life. His lead attorney Nenye Uche told CBS News there has always been “a mountain of reasonable doubt and evidence pointing to his innocence in this case that nobody has bothered to take a look at.”

Uche even claimed that Smollett was only prosecuted in the first place because his fame made him an easy target. He said, “If this was the regular Joe down the street, this case would never even have gone to trial. No prosecutor would have taken this case to trial. It was ridiculous. There was no direct evidence linking him to anything.”

However, Webb – the prosecutor responsible for the second prosecution – claimed that the reversing of Smollett’s conviction did not prove his innocence. Instead, he alleged the actor was effectively getting off on a technicality.

Webb remarked, “The Illinois Supreme Court did not find any error with the overwhelming evidence presented at trial that Mr Smollett orchestrated a fake hate crime and reported it to the Chicago Police Department as a real hate crime, or the jury’s unanimous verdict that Mr Smollett was guilty of five counts of felony disorderly conduct. In fact, Mr Smollett did not even challenge the sufficiency of the evidence against him in his appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court.”